Vulvovaginal Candidiasis in Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, North‑West Nigeria: Hospital‑Based Epidemiological Study
- *Corresponding Author:
- Dr. Emmanuel Ajuluchukwu Ugwa
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Federal Medical Centre, Birnin Kudu, Jigawa State, Nigeria.
E-mail: zoputaclinic74@gmail.com
Citation: Ugwa EA. Vulvovaginal candidiasis in Aminu Kano teaching hospital, North West Nigeria: Hospital-based epidemiological study. Ann Med Health Sci Res 2015;5:274-8.
Abstract
Background: Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) remains a common problem worldwide and the role of douching as a predisposing factor is unclear. Aim: This study was undertaken to highlight the prevalence and predisposing factors of VVC in North‑west Nigeria. Subjects and Methods: This was a prospective study done at Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital (AKTH), North‑west. AKTH is a 500‑bed tertiary hospital located in Kano, the most populous state in Nigeria. Ethical clearance was obtained. Three hundred patients with VVC were recruited from the gynecologic and general outpatients’ clinics of AKTH. Research structured questionnaires were used to obtain sociodemographic and clinical information. The data obtained were analyzed using SPSS version 16.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago IL, USA). Frequency, mean and simple percentages were used to analyze data. Result: Candida albicans was the most frequent cause of the positive high vaginal swabs constituting 84.5% (316/374) while Proteus vulgaris was the least frequent cause constituting 0.53% (2/374). Fifty‑three percent (143/270) of those with VVC were aged 26–35 years; the married were 80% (216/270) and those who were unmarried were 20% (54/270). Douching was the commonest predisposing factor occurring in 42.5% (115/270) of cases. Conclusion: VVC was the most prevalent cause of vaginosis in North‑west Nigeria, and douching was the commonest predisposing factor.
Keywords
Epidemiology, Hospital, Nigeria, North-west, Vulvovaginal candidiasis
Introduction
Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) remains a common problem worldwide, affecting all strata of society. The absence of rapid, simple, and inexpensive diagnostic tests continues to result in both overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis of VVC. Although commonly caused by Candida albicans, non-albican species and immunosuppression have led to the development of recurrent diseases some of which are nonresponsive to conventional antifungal regimes.
Nwadioha and colleagues reported that C. albicans were responsible for 60% of high vaginal swab (HVS) speimen.[1] Ibrahim and colleagues in a study done in Maiduguri, north-east Nigeria, reported a prevalence of 41% among pregnant women attending antenatal care.[2] Another study involving a cohort of apparently healthy women reported that about 30% had yeast isolated, confirming the diagnosis of VVC.[3]
Studies have reported the prevalence of VVC as 25%,[4] 24%[5] and 18.5%.[6] Parveen et al. Maccato and Kaufman reported a high rate among pregnant women[7,8] and Okonofua et al., reported a high carriage of C. albicans in Nigeria infertile women compared with controls.[9] Okonkwo reported no significant difference in prevalence of VVC among women of various socioeconomic status in Nnewi.[10]
A higher prevalence of vaginal colonization and symptomatic vaginitis is more often seen in pregnant women than in those who are not pregnant and this is due to high concentrations of reproductive hormones that increase the glycogen content in the vaginal tissue thereby providing a carbon source for candida organisms.[11]
Increased vaginal colonization with candida has been shown after the use of oral contraceptives with high estrogen content.[12] Increased carriage of yeast is reported in users of intrauterine contraceptive devices, contraceptive sponges, diaphragms, and condoms, with or without spermicides.[13]
However, an extensive study of college students did not show an increase in the risk of symptomatic VVC in users of oral contraceptives, diaphragms, condoms, or spermicides.[14] Women with type 2 diabetes are more prone to colonization with Candida glabrata.[15] Symptomatic VVC frequently follows use of vaginal or systemic antibiotics.[16] Douching has been shown to be a risk factor for candida vulvovaginitis for some women, and for others, there was no relationship found. Ekpenyong and Davis, in Uyo, found a paradoxical relation between vaginal douching and adverse reproductive tract disorders.[17] Heng, et al.,[18] found a high prevalence of VVC among Cambodian women who douched, while no similar association was reported among Indian women by Sujit, et al.[19]
With much emphasis on drug use and misuse by the female folks with respect to reproductive tract infections, little interest is shown in some cultural practices such as douching which can also predispose women to certain reproductive tract infections including VVC.
The aim of this study is to highlight the prevalence and predisposing factors of VVC in North-west Nigeria and make a recommendation on how to reduce the prevalence.
Subjects and Methods
This was a prospective study done at Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital (AKTH), North-west. AKTH is a 500-bed Tertiary Hospital Located in Kano, the most populous state in Nigeria. Ethical approval was obtained from AKTH Research and Ethics Committee with reference number AKTH/MAC/SUB/12A/P3/796 and dated January 21, 2010. Informed consent was also obtained from the respondents. The study period was between November 1, 2011 and February 28, 2012 and involved 300 women who had clinical and laboratory evidence of VVC. Selection was by simple random sampling.
Sample size was calculated based on prevalence of VVC from previous studies.[6-9]
n = z2 P q/d2
(n = Sample size, z = Standard normal deviation = 1.96 at 95% confidence limit, P = Prevalence rate = 22.5%, q = 1-P = 1–22.5% =0.775, d = Error margin ═ 5%).
The minimum sample size was 268. Because of the possibility of drop-out the sample size was increased to 300 after applying the exclusion criteria. Exclusion criteria were females less than 16 years of age, those who were menstruating, those who had any immunosuppressive illness, those with history of diabetes mellitus, those with recurrent VVC, those with premalignant or malignant cervical lesions and those who were pregnant.
Postmenarchal females with a diagnosis of VVC were included in the study. The patients had a clinical diagnosis of VVC based on history and physical examination (including vaginal examination).
Postmenarchal females with a diagnosis of VVC were included in the study. The patients had a clinical diagnosis of VVC based on history and physical examination (including vaginal examination). Signs and symptoms that were evaluated include: Itching, burning, irritation, edema, erythema and/or excoriation of the vagina/vulva. Each evaluated sign and/or symptom was given a numerical rating based on severity (absent = 0; mild = 1; moderate = 2; severe = 3). Patients with VVC may have a vaginal discharge, which is usually described as white, creamy, and cottage cheese-like in appearance and adherent to the epithelium.
Research structured questionnaires were administered to all the 300 subjects. These gave various sociodemographic and clinical informations. To ensure content validity of the research instrument, the draft questionnaire was submitted to a senior colleague for scrutiny regarding the relevance of each item. Pretesting of the questionnaire was also done where 20 self-administered questionnaires were distributed to volunteers with vulvovaginal symptoms to comment on the clarity of the questions. All the recruited patients were examined by the researcher. They were put in lithotomy position, and the vulva was inspected. Under good light, a sterile Cusco’s bivalve speculum was used to expose the vagina after swabbing the vulva with sterile water. Specimens were taken from the posterior fornix with a sterile cotton swab that was immediately put into a sterile tube containing about 3 ml of saline. A screening 10% potassium hydroxide (KOH) preparation from the inflamed vaginal mucosa or vaginal discharge was done to identify yeast forms (hyphae/pseudohyphae) or budding yeasts. A drop of 10% KOH on the pool of the secretion on the speculum when it produced a fishy smell denoted a positive test for Gardnerella vaginalis. The tube was labeled with the patient’s initials and case form number and taken to the laboratory for further investigations that included wet microscopy and preparation of a dry Gram stain slide for microscopy. A Gram stain slide can reveal candida (pseudohyphae) or Bacteria vaginosis (clue cells and proportions of lactobacilli and other organisms). Wet microscopy was prepared in the laboratory by dipping a small amount of discharge from a HVS into saline on a microscope slide. This was useful in identifying pseudohyphae in candida. Culture in Sabouraud’s medium was used to detect the candida when microscopy was inconclusive. Whenever the HVS was not transported immediately to the laboratory, it was stored at 4°C for no longer than 48 h. Those HVS specimens in which C. albicans was isolated were included in the study.
The data obtained were analyzed using SPSS version 16.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago IL, USA). Absolute numbers and simple percentages were used to describe categorical variables. Similarly, quantitative variables were described using measures of central tendency (mean, median) and measures of dispersion (range, standard deviation) as appropriate.
Results
Of the 300 women included in the study, 30 were drop-outs and 90% (270/300) completed the study. These 30 droppers did not continue with the study because their husbands did not give consent for them to participate in the study. The culture in many parts of Northern Nigeria is that the husbands consent is required about aspects of the woman’s reproductive and sexual health. VVC constituted 84.5% of all HVS specimens. The results are shown in Tables 1-3.
Organism | Frequency percentage |
---|---|
Candida albicans | 316 (84.5) |
Streptococcus species | 20 (5.35) |
Staphylococcus species | 14 (3.74) |
Escherichia coli | 14 (3.74) |
Bacterial vaginosis | 8 (2.14) |
Proteus vulgaris | 2 (0.53) |
Table 1: Microbiological pattern in 374 positive high vaginal swabs specimens in AKTH
Parameters | Frequency (%) | Mean (SD) |
---|---|---|
Age (year) | 27.7 (7.8) | |
16-25 | 90 (33.3) | |
26-35 | 143 (53) | |
36-45 | 37 (13.70 | |
Parity | 2 (2) | |
0 | 60 (22.2) | |
1-2 | 113 (41.9) | |
3-4 | 62 (23.00) | |
≥5 | 35 (13.0) | |
Marital status | ||
Married | 216 (80) | |
Unmarried | 54 (20) | |
Occupation | ||
Housewife | 119 (44.1) | |
Employee | 61 (22.6) | |
Trader | 29 (10.7) | |
Students | 61 (22.6) | |
Educational status | ||
None | 64 (23.7) | |
Primary | 34 (12.6) | |
Secondary | 72 (26.7) | |
Tertiary | 100 (37.0) | |
SD: Standard deviation |
Table 2: Distribution of sociodemographic characteristics of study population
Parameters | Frequency (%) | Mean (SD) |
---|---|---|
Presenting clinical features | - | |
Cheesy vaginal discharge | 128 (47.4) | |
Itching | 82 (30.4) | |
Burning | 27(10) | |
Redness | 33 (12.2) | |
Total | 270 (100) | |
Duration of symptoms (days) | 13.3 (7.4) | |
0-7 | 71 (26.3) | |
8-14 | 105 (38.9) | |
15-21 | 57 (21.1) | |
22-29 | 37 (13.7) | |
Total | 270(100) | |
Patient’s perception of the | - | |
source of infection | ||
Sexual | 73 (27) | |
Toilet | 113 (41.9) | |
Unknown | 84 (31.1) | |
Total | 270(100) | |
Risk factors | - | |
Contraceptive | 78 (28.9) | |
Antibiotics | 52 (19.3) | |
Douching | 115 (42.6) | |
None | 25 (9.3) | |
Total | 270(100) | |
SD: Standard deviation |
Table 3: Distribution of clinical presentations, perceptions and predisposing factors of vulvovaginal candidiasis in the study population
Discussion
This study reports a very high prevalence (84.5%) of VVC compared to 25%,[4] 24%,[5] 18.5%[6] and 61%[1] from previous studies. The report of this study is similar to that of Onifade and Olorunfemi in Ondo State who reported a prevalence of 81.5%.[20]
Vulvovaginal candidiasis occurs among women in the age group 16–45 years as shown in this study. This was similarly reported.[4,21] The reason is the high estrogen levels in this group of women resulting in a favorable pH for candida colonization. The mean age of women with VVC in this study was 27.7 (7.8) years. The condition was more prevalent in women aged 26–35 years (53%) and lowest in those aged 36–45 years (13.7%). This report is a replication of that of another study[22] that showed that the occurrence of VVC peaks in the third decade of life, declining in women older than 40 years. It is, however, contrary to study by Ako-Nai et al.,[23] where highest incidence was among women 20–25 years of age.
This present study has shown that marital factor affects the prevalence of VVC. Although Enweani et al.,[24] reported that marital factor had no effect on the prevalence of VVC, Okungbowa et al.,[22] are of the view that marital factor was important. This study showed higher incidence among the married (69.6%) compared to the unmarried (30.4%). The report of this study agrees with that of Okungbowa, et al.,[22] that VVC is commoner among the married women.
The result of this study has shown that cheesy vaginal discharge was the commonest presentation in patients with VVC occurring in 47.4% of cases. This was followed by vulval itching or pruritus that occurred in 30.4% of cases. Vulval redness occurred in 12.2% and vulval burning sensation in 10% of cases. This is compatible with the reported symptoms for VVC including vaginal discharge, burning and pruritus.[25,26] Vaginal discharge is a common presentation in gynecological patients.[27,28]
Of 41.9% of the patients believed that they contracted VVC from the toilet, 31.1% did not know the source of the infection and 27% believed that it was sexually transmitted. Rabiu et al.,[29] from Lagos, Nigeria, also reported that 44.6% of women perceived that they contracted reproductive tract infection from the toilet, followed by sexual intercourse and poor hygiene. Although VVC is not a sexually transmitted disease, there are some evidences to suggest that the frequency/periodicity of sexual intercourse is associated with acute vaginitis.[13]
Douching was the most common risk factor responsible for VVC prevalence occurring in 42.6% of the patients in this study, followed by use of contraceptives (combined oral contraceptive pills and intrauterine devices) in 28.9% of cases and antibiotics use in 19.3% of cases. Douching has been shown to be a risk factor for candida vulvovaginitis for some women, and for others, there was no relationship found.[18,19,30]
This study has also shown that VVC is associated with usage of the oral contraceptive pills and intrauterine contraceptive devices. While this finding is similar to some studies,[14] it is not replicated by others.[31]
Vulvovaginal candidiasis is the most prevalent cause of vaginosis in North-west Nigeria and douching is the commonest predisposing factor. It will be a good practice to discourage women from douching.
The limitation of this study is that the use of the questionnaire means that individual opinion was assessed which may not be very objective. Also, future research using case-control design may help make better deductions.
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by the author. The author acknowledges the technical support provided by Dr. Muhammad Zakari, a senior colleague, of Obstetrics/Gynecology Department of Bayero University, Kano during the preparation of this manuscript.
References
- Nwadioha SI, Nwokedi EO, Egesie J, Enejuo H. Vaginal candidiasis and its risk factors among women attending a Nigerian teaching hospital. Niger Postgrad Med J 2013;20:20-3.
- women with abnormal vaginal discharge in Maiduguri. Niger J Med 2013;22:138-42.
- McCormack WM Jr, Zinner SH, McCormack WM. The incidence of genitourinary infections in a cohort of healthy women. Sex Transm Dis 1994;21:63-4.
- Kwawukume EY, Arhin RA. Vulvovaginitis. In: Kwawukume EY, Emuveyan EE, editors. Comprehensive Gynaecology in the Tropics. 1st ed. Dansoman: Asante and Hittscher Printing Press Limited; 2002. p. 72-4.
- Mirza NB, Nsanze H, D’Costa LJ, Piot P. Microbiology of vaginal discharge in Nairobi, Kenya. Br J Vener Dis 1983;59:186-8.
- Otero L, Palacio V, Carreño F, Méndez FJ, Vázquez F. Vulvovaginal candidiasis in female sex workers. Int J STD AIDS 1998;9:526-30.
- Parveen N, Munir AA, Din I, Majeed R. Frequency of vaginal candidiasis in pregnant women attending routine antenatal clinic. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2008;18:154-7.
- Maccato ML, Kaufman RH Fungal vulvovaginitis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1991;3:849-52.
- Okonofua FE, Ako-Nai KA, Dighitoghi MD. Lower genital tract infections in infertile Nigerian women compared with controls. Genitourin Med 1995;71:163-8.
- Okonkwo NJ. Prevalence of vaginal candidiasis among pregnant women in Nnewi town of Anambra State, Nigeria. Afr Res Rev 2010;4:539-48.
- Dennerstein GJ, Ellis DH Oestrogen, glycogen and vaginal candidiasis. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2001;41:326-8.
- Tarry W, Fisher M, Shen S, Mawhinney M. Candida albicans: The estrogen target for vaginal colonization. J Surg Res 2005;129:278-82.
- Reed BD, Zazove P, Pierson CL, Gorenflo DW, Horrocks J.Candida transmission and sexual behaviors as risks fora repeat episode of Candida vulvovaginitis. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2003;12:979-89.
- Demirezen S, Dirlik OO, Beksaç MS. The association of Candida infection with intrauterine contraceptive device. Cent Eur J Public Health 2005;13:32-4.
- Donders GG, Prenen H, Verbeke G, Reybrouck R. Impaired tolerance for glucose in women with recurrent vaginal candidiasis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:989-93.
- Pirotta MV, Gunn JM, Chondros P. “Not thrush again!” Women’s experience of post-antibiotic vulvovaginitis. Med J Aust 2003;179:43-6.
- Ekpenyong CE, Davies KG. Associations between vaginal douching practice and lower genital tract symptoms and menstrual disorders among young women: A Search for risk modulating factors. Adv Sex Med 2013;3:76-84.
- Heng LS, Yatsuya H, Morita S, Sakamoto J. Vaginal douching in Cambodian women: Its prevalence and association with vaginal candidiasis. J Epidemiol 2010;20:70-6.
- Rathod SD, Klausner JD, Krupp K, Reingold AL, Madhivanan P. Epidemiologic features of vulvovaginal candidiasis among reproductive-age women in India. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2012;2012:859071.
- Onifade AK, Olorunfemi OB. Epidemiology of vulvovaginal candidiasis in female patients in Ondo State Government Hospital. J Food Agric Environ 2005;3:118-9.
- Baker PN, editor. Infection in gynaecology. In: Obstetrics by Ten Teachers. 18th ed. London: Hodder Arnold; 2006. p. 167-9.
- Okungbowa FI, Isikhuemhen OS, Dede AP. The distribution frequency of Candida species in the genitourinary tract among symptomatic individuals in Nigerian cities. Rev Iberoam Micol 2003;20:60-3.
- Ako-Nai AK, Kassim OO, Adeniran MO, Taiwo O. A study of urinary tract infections at Ile-Ife, Nigeria. East Afr Med J 1993;70:10-4.
- Enweani IB, Ogbonna CI, Kozak W. The incidence of candidiasis amongst the asymptomatic female students of the University of Jos, Nigeria. Mycopathologia 1987;99:135-41.
- Zahra F, Shahram H, Sedigheh A, Mahshid T. Vaginal azoles versus oral fluconazole in treatment of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. Iran J Clin Infect Dis 2007;2:17-22.
- Eschenbach DA. Pelvic infections and sexually transmitted diseases. In: Scott JR, Gibbs RS, Karlan BY, Haney A. Danforth’s Obstetrics and Gynecology. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Lipincott Williams and Wilkins; 2003. p. 585-7.
- Abudu OO, Anorlu RI. Vagina discharge. In: Agboola A, editor. Textbook of Obstetrics and Gynaecology for Medical Students. 2nd ed. Ibadan: Heinemann Educational Books (Nigeria) Plc; 2006. p. 70-2.
- Glover DD, Larsen B. Relationship of fungal vaginitis therapy to prior antibiotic exposure. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2003;11:157-60.
- Rabiu KA, Adewunmi AA, Akinlusi FM, Akinola OI. Female reproductive tract infections: Understandings and care seeking behaviour among women of reproductive age in Lagos, Nigeria. BMC Womens Health 2010;10:8.
- Cottrell BH. An updated review of of evidence to discourage douching. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 2010;35:102-7.
- Davidson F, Oates JK. The pill does not cause ‘thrush’. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985;92:1265-6.